Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 3, 2024, 1:47 pm UTC    
May 11, 2023 07:47AM
Ahatmose Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No offence but Lehner's book was so full of holes
> it was a best seller in Switzerland. And his math
> is laughable.
>
> And I believe you put down "estimate" for
> Lehner's measurement. You find this more
> trustworthy than Petrie ?
>
> You have changed every single value for the
> measurements of the pyramids save G1 (at 9069.4
> north side but average of 9068.8) to make your
> theory fit.
>
> I can not agree with it. But then who am I ? You
> trying to pin point the beginning is commendable
> but you can't do it sacrificing all the other
> measurements ever taken.
>
> Good Luck


Dash, Cole and Petrie are in agreement that the average base-length of the Khufu is 9069.4". At 440 cubits that is 22x the length of the KC.
I.e., the Khufu was built to the measure of 22 average Strides of Re in 2541 BC.

The distance from the doorway to the W. wall of the Khafre Main Chamber is 412.8". At (412.8" / 20) 20.64" cubit x 20.5 average Strides (410 cubits) this encodes the base-length of the Khafre as 8462.4". Which is confirmed by the Tropic's ground-speed in 2519 BC, at 412.8" / 34.4 f.p.y. (Pg. 256)
It is the reason why the coffer in the Khafre Chamber was blocked into position, since the cubit computation derives from the Tropic^6' position there in 2519 BC. The Khafre Main Chamber was designed to 9.5 cubits in width, the Pyramid's height is 274.5 cubits. At 20.5 Strides base-length it measures half a Stride less than the Red Pyramid base, and a Stride and a half less than the Khufu base. The Pyramid's offset between average and specific Strides was 40 days, half that of the Khufu Pyramid. The general design scheme of Giza was whole numbers for the Khufu, half such for the Khafre, and quadripartite for the Menkaure. (pg.187)

Petrie did not measure the casing of the Khafre since it was inaccessible in his time. He measured the rock ledge around the Pyramid at 8474.9" average length. If that were the base-length of the Khafre, then, at 410 cubits the Tropic's speed would have measured 413.41" per year, which it did not until 2495 BC. Neither could the Khafre have been built to 411 cubits in base-length, since the Tropic's speed would have had to equal 412.4", which was only so in 2535 BC, during the reign of Djedefre. Also, every Pyramid in Egypt designed by the average Stride was built by full or half Strides, as for the length and width of the KC of the Khufu.

These values are highly specific and not a matter of estimation, as Lehner's figures are. In this case, both Lehner and Petrie's figures are inaccurate for the base-length of the Khafre. See pg. 228 re. how the Heliopolitan architects interwove the base-length designs of the Meidum, Dashur and Giza Pyramids.

I'm happy to discuss, but for goodness' sake man: if interested, read my work thoroughly before you fire off misguided comments or misquote me. You don't even seem to realise there was no year zero between 1 BC and 1 A.D. or that the prototype Pyramids of Meidum and Dashur were not built under the Sun Eye, rather, considerably distant. There were distinct reasons for their locations, (pg.117, 177) but time did not 'run backwards' or from south to north... etc..
Subject Author Posted

Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

robin cook May 02, 2023 04:20AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Jon_B May 02, 2023 02:01PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

cladking May 02, 2023 05:25PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 02, 2023 04:20PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 02, 2023 04:44PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 02, 2023 05:03PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Hermione May 02, 2023 05:21PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 02, 2023 05:41PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 02, 2023 05:52PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 02, 2023 05:56PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 02, 2023 06:21PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

hrst1 May 03, 2023 06:38AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Hermione May 03, 2023 07:35AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

hrst1 May 03, 2023 05:58PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 03, 2023 06:43PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 08, 2023 08:14AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 08, 2023 08:25AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 08, 2023 03:08PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 08, 2023 03:44PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

hrst1 May 08, 2023 09:09PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 10, 2023 09:47AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

hrst1 May 11, 2023 07:47AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 11, 2023 12:52PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

hrst1 May 12, 2023 12:13AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 12, 2023 03:55AM

**Moderation note**

Hermione May 12, 2023 05:24AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Kanga May 14, 2023 03:23AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

hrst1 May 16, 2023 12:45AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 05, 2023 03:13PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 06, 2023 01:46PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 06, 2023 02:15PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 06, 2023 02:47PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 06, 2023 06:00PM

Year 6000

Ahatmose May 06, 2023 06:33PM

Re: Year 6000

Ahatmose May 06, 2023 07:43PM

Re: Year 6000

Ahatmose May 06, 2023 07:58PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Byrd May 03, 2023 09:06PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 03, 2023 09:36PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

hrst1 May 04, 2023 05:03AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 10, 2023 10:59PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 11, 2023 01:54PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 11, 2023 07:20PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 12, 2023 10:11PM

Addendum

Ahatmose May 12, 2023 10:46PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

hrst1 May 13, 2023 12:28AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 13, 2023 01:03AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 13, 2023 01:27AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

hrst1 May 13, 2023 10:31PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 14, 2023 10:02AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

hrst1 May 14, 2023 11:34PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Hermione May 09, 2023 02:17AM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Kanga May 02, 2023 08:54PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 02, 2023 09:10PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 02, 2023 09:22PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Kanga May 02, 2023 09:40PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Ahatmose May 02, 2023 09:48PM

Re: Legon - evidence for mathematical methods

Kanga May 03, 2023 01:19AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login