Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 3, 2024, 1:43 pm UTC    
October 23, 2010 10:19AM
Byrd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> sansahansan Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The change from Shamanism to a
> religion/belief
> > system is viewed as different by scienctists
> > (anthro & paleosocio & archae -
> ologists)
>
> Not really. A religion has a formal structure and
> formal hierarchy of priests with someone at the
> top (prophet, pope, high priest, or a group with
> those functions), telling them what the
> deity/deities say. Priests are often intercessors
> or intermediaries between the people and the
> deity.
>
> Shamanism/animism is where individuals are
> "inspired/possessed by/directed by spirits (and
> possibly deities)" and there are tales about these
> deities but they are not codified into a strict
> hierarchy with rules and rites. Shamans take
> apprentices, but there can be 3-4 (or more)
> shamans in a tribe and all of them saying
> different things.
>
> Priests act collectively and are in agreement with
> the main tenants of their religion. Shamans... are
> like herding cats. For example, the Tlingit
> practices are shamanism. They have formal
> (strict) rituals and practices that they follow,
> but there was no "high priest of the nation of the
> Tlingit" and anyone could call up spirits and seek
> advice from deities. Some of the Native Americans
> did have a true religion... The Mississippian
> Caddoans had organized temples and temple mounds
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caddo_Indians#Archae
> ology )
>
> > I am seriously considering going back to
> school
> > for a comparative mythology degree, but I'm
> trying
> > to decide if it's a hokum degree or something
> with
> > actual granite roots in reality?
>
> Might depend on the school and the professors.
>
>
> -- Byrd
> Moderator, Hall of Ma'at
>
>
>
> Edited 1 times. Last edit at 10/21/10 07:07PM by
> Byrd.

But...amongst the Tlingit the Shamans place IS well defined within the overall 'tribal' Heirarchy. I don't think one can so easily separate their version of the church and the State. But awareness of the role their beliefs played in their daily lives is the direct result of one seeing how easily they went along with the Dictates of Missionary Policy. They had no concept of a Holy Man NOT having their best interests at heart.

That is a common theme amongst the devout no matter what the belief system.


Warwick

" I have always found that the main obstacle to free
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."

Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019
Subject Author Posted

sacred geodesy , Muslim?

Ogygos September 24, 2010 01:03AM

Re: sacred geodesy , Muslim?

Ogygos September 24, 2010 01:42AM

correction

Ogygos September 27, 2010 02:56PM

Re: sacred geodesy , Muslim?

Byrd September 24, 2010 11:13AM

Re: sacred geodesy , Muslim?

Ogygos September 25, 2010 04:21PM

Re: sacred geodesy , Muslim?

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2010 02:07PM

sacred geodesy , Muslim?

Jammer September 29, 2010 02:14PM

Re: sacred geodesy , Muslim?

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2010 02:25PM

Re: sacred geodesy , Muslim?

Khazar-khum September 26, 2010 05:15PM

Re: sacred geodesy , Muslim?

Ogygos September 27, 2010 03:11PM

orientation

Ogygos September 28, 2010 03:35PM

Re: orientation

sansahansan October 01, 2010 01:49PM

Re: orientation

Ogygos October 03, 2010 03:08AM

I'll ask again

Warwick L Nixon October 03, 2010 11:28AM

Re: orientation

Khazar-khum October 03, 2010 11:47PM

Re: orientation

Warwick L Nixon October 04, 2010 11:49AM

Re: orientation

Ogygos October 04, 2010 03:07PM

Re: orientation

Warwick L Nixon October 04, 2010 05:16PM

FYI

Warwick L Nixon October 04, 2010 06:54PM

Re: orientation

sansahansan October 12, 2010 09:18AM

Re: orientation

Pete Clarke October 12, 2010 09:31AM

Re: orientation

sansahansan October 12, 2010 03:50PM

Re: orientation

Byrd October 13, 2010 12:35AM

Re: orientation

sansahansan October 13, 2010 09:55AM

Re: orientation

Pete Clarke October 13, 2010 10:46AM

Re: orientation

Khazar-khum October 13, 2010 03:42PM

Re: orientation

Byrd October 14, 2010 02:12PM

Re: orientation

sansahansan October 14, 2010 03:16PM

Re: orientation

Byrd October 17, 2010 03:10PM

Re: orientation

sansahansan October 20, 2010 03:21PM

Re: orientation

Warwick L Nixon October 21, 2010 10:59AM

Re: orientation

Byrd October 21, 2010 10:55PM

Re: orientation

Warwick L Nixon October 23, 2010 10:19AM

Re: orientation

Byrd October 26, 2010 06:12PM

Re: orientation

Warwick L Nixon October 28, 2010 11:02AM

Re: orientation

sansahansan October 25, 2010 08:30AM

Re: orientation

Khazar-khum October 13, 2010 01:02AM

Re: orientation

sansahansan October 13, 2010 09:29AM

Re: orientation

Rick Baudé October 14, 2010 09:55AM

Re: orientation

Pete Clarke October 13, 2010 03:53AM

Re: orientation

sansahansan October 13, 2010 09:37AM

Re: orientation

Khazar-khum October 13, 2010 03:44PM

Re: orientation

sansahansan October 14, 2010 08:34AM

Re: orientation

Warwick L Nixon October 15, 2010 11:41AM

Re: orientation

Khazar-khum October 19, 2010 03:31AM

Re: orientation

Warwick L Nixon October 19, 2010 09:43AM

Re: orientation

sansahansan October 20, 2010 03:26PM

Re: orientation

Warwick L Nixon October 21, 2010 11:06AM

Re: orientation

Khazar-khum October 22, 2010 02:34AM

Re: orientation

Warwick L Nixon October 23, 2010 10:31AM

Re: orientation

Khazar-khum October 24, 2010 12:47AM

Re: orientation

Warwick L Nixon October 24, 2010 10:37AM

Re: orientation

Khazar-khum October 24, 2010 04:56PM

Re: orientation

Warwick L Nixon October 15, 2010 11:32AM

Mecca – Orion – 666

Ogygos August 05, 2011 01:45PM

Re: Mecca – Orion – 666

Hermione August 05, 2011 04:05PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login