lobo hotei wrote: You proved your own lack of skills in math. I already addressed this in the thread it originated. Why you thought to bring it here and tie it in mid stream with another completely different topic is more of that deceptive debate you love so much.

I believe the topics are related, we are talking about cubits are we not!
Actually you addressed nothing, merely made an excuse! I guess I am just too stupid to actually believe someone would not be smart enough to take 1.7181818... as a conversion factor since we all know 1.7181818...is a foot to cubit ratio. Which is really being pretty petty, is that is all you could find wrong?

lobo hotei wrote: Though I think my value would be the one chosen as I believe it was determined that they preferred the fewer number of fractions.

I said you are correct in your belief, if your preferred method is the answer then the other is in essence wrong!