>>And your entire theory is nothing but hypothetical...<<
Theories that lead to predictions or to the realization of particular planetary or cosmic in general cycles which were not known until now - actually forgotten - are theories that explain facts.

>>I STATED any race capable of space travel has already solved certain basic social challenges before traveling.To wit; they either eliminate cannibalism, or their spacecraft arrives with one overweight pilot.<<
Do you know of any ufo wreckage where signs of cannibalism have been found, or are you insinuating that AE of the OK practiced cannibalism?

>>Whoa Nellie... either they CARE, or they don't. They didn't come millions of light years to construct a ground layout to warn us about the end of the world because they DIDN'T care.<<
I never said anything about an end of the world warning, so they have just found it entertaining.

>>I stated that solutions to social challenges that took the human race milennia to solve could have been introduced by your advance race in a few years.<<
We cannot theorize on what knowledge they wanted to share and what not. As I said one again the alien hypothesis is just one of many so I will not waste time getting into this type of reasoning. Things are simple. We have the facts and we find the best and simplest theory - see Occam's razor - that explains them.

>>You can't have a race that cared to warn the humans 12,000 years in advance but NOT help them easily in the present tense.<<
See above, warn about what?

>>"If we ignore 23 degrees" (a 26% error margin) but demand 99.4% date accuracy (one year out of 174 year cycle on the planet the AE could see) establishes an epic dichotomy. The two do not belong in the same theory.<<
Didn't you read my previous post on the differences between obliquity and orbit inclination?