Hello Colette,
You grammar looks fine to me but who am I to judge, my writing style is a lot worse.

>>I would like to ask so maybe I can understand you better, how is it that you come up with these notions besides comparing similar numbers or letters or implying definitions? What exactly is it that you are inferring and where are your thoughts headed in defining history? Like -- what is it you are attempting to claim stake to from these configurations?<<

Scientific information from various feilds – physics, mathematics, chemistry, astronomy, geology/deodecy etc was encoded in the past in different forms by members of an advanced civilization. This information was encoded in the layout and positioning of temples, pyramids, cities, sacred sites etc. It was also encoded in the ancient Hellenic alphabet in the name – position and form of the letters that compose it. Also important names like sacred animals(hawk etc), Gods, toponyms etc, we either formed or transformed as to encode via isopsephia – gematria – wordnumber theory particular arithmetic values. Thus myths which at first glance look like silly fantastic stories sometimes hold important encoded information. We just need to use common sense to determine which are encoded and what they encode.

>>As I read your posts I can not help to notice your grammar and vocabulary are written in regards to offering remarkable, undeniable data as clear and proven evidence for claims and notions you state and you even linger out numerically (round up or down) a few decimal places in values where needed in hopes of more accurately presenting rigor in your methodology of numbers/numerology. But, to me, it seems you write and apply your own rules and change them as necessary to illustrate illusions/visions you have derived based off of your obvious biased interpretation of numbers, letters and ???? (what all else) and nothing more.<<

Word number relations due to the fact that ancient Hellenic letters had integer values are based on integers, thus any decimal number has to be rounded to the closest integer. There is no hocus – pocus in this. Also the arithmetic value of an ancient Hellenic word is based on the accepted values of the particular alphabet system. Everyone one net uses the Ionic alphabet, but this does not mean it was the only one since there were other alphabets – like the Boeotic with slightly different values. These values are documented by ancient artifacts. On the other hand one must try to find the original encoding, the original spelling(in a particular dialect etc.) – in this way word-number inquiry is more related to archeology than it is to mathematics. You see what you dig up and try to explain what it means. Usually finds in one particular area like archeology or architecture agree and reinforce findings in another like mythology and linguistics – word creation.

BR
Ogygos