Hello Ogygos,

I know my grammar is weird and I write strange compared to others and you may think I do not understand what you want to present as even I have a hard time writing what I mean.

You are correct; I do not read or grasp any pertinent info that relates to any great observation with any merit.

I would like to ask so maybe I can understand you better, how is it that you come up with these notions besides comparing similar numbers or letters or implying definitions? What exactly is it that you are inferring and where are your thoughts headed in defining history? Like -- what is it you are attempting to claim stake to from these configurations?

As I read your posts I can not help to notice your grammar and vocabulary are written in regards to offering remarkable, undeniable data as clear and proven evidence for claims and notions you state and you even linger out numerically (round up or down) a few decimal places in values where needed in hopes of more accurately presenting rigor in your methodology of numbers/numerology. But, to me, it seems you write and apply your own rules and change them as necessary to illustrate illusions/visions you have derived based off of your obvious biased interpretation of numbers, letters and ???? (what all else) and nothing more.

(I say this as it is true) "However, again, I may be wrong." - This time I do not think so though, but if I am, set me straight.



Colette


Dr. Colette M. Dowell, N.D.
Circular Times
[www.circulartimes.org]