Hello Jammer,

Quote

BUT it's the leap you propose from this knowledge to a deep understanding of geometric principles, which wasn't measured and codified for another 2,100 years, I cannot digest. The best I can research, the Laws of Geometry were first laid down circa 300bce starting with Euclid. Imho there is no need to introduce Pi, Arcs, Radius, etc. to explain these megalithic constructs.

SC: Show me the Pi, arcs, radius, etc that would have to be understood in this (possible) design imperative:

[www.scottcreighton.co.uk]

Quote

Jammer: IF you have any hidden knowledge proving these principles were understood and applied more than two millennia earlier please, PLEASE refer me to them.

SC: If I am correct in my proposition that the design mechanism I present above was the underlying design imperative (i.e. the PLAN) followed by the AEs of the 4th Dyn. then already we are talking about revising our understanding of how the structures at Giza came about because conventional wisdom holds that they did not form any part of an AE trans-generational construction project which my design mechanism suggests. And if the design mechanism I propose is indeed correct, then it opens the door - at least in my book - to a complete review of our current understanding of what the AEs of the 4th Dyn did know and what they did not know and that includes Pi, Arcs, Radius, etc.

Regards,

SC