In February of 2006, you posted this at the Guardians site:

Quote

I am particularly fascinated with the Giza three as many are. I do not ascribe to theory that these pyramids are three separately designed complex's, rather I find them to be a set or a group belonging to a grand scheme. Furthermore I believe Menkaure's pyramid, as we see it today, is an upgrade from a much older (step) pyramid.

[egyptologist.org]

Do you still subscribe to this flawed model?

If so, do you happen to have the conspicuously absent evidence of intent to make such a bold assertion that contradicts known evidence from the Old Kingdom?

Or, perhaps, since posting the above statement, have you realized that starting with the assumption, rather than the evidence, is a particularly bad method of research?

I look forward to your considered response. Welcome to Ma'at.

Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.