Anthony,

Yes I fully ascribe to my statement made at Guardian's, very much, and thank you for posting the comment here in this forum. No I have not had a change of heart or suffered a dose of conventional wisdoms, on the contrary the more I engage in these forums I learn more about what I discovered. I do have a "constructive solution" that reveals why they were built and what they represent. I learned early on it is of no value to argue the proof in an open forum such as Guardians or here, rather I plan to publish my work in its entire construct. I am able to do exactly that which I mentioned to C. Wayne and then some.

I have selectively exchanged some of my perimeter ideas and thoughts in public forums, mostly to either learn more or view the reactions, J.D. Degreef is a great filter and I value his thoughts greatly. Having said that, I am of the opinion that conventional theorists lack very little in their ability to use analytical processes of objects from a period/era, their work is substantial and thorough, however on the whole they only prove the most obvious and guess at the rest. Most if not all of the "paranormal" attributes filed on the Giza pyramids are nothing more than natural byproducts of the schematic mechanisms used to size and place each pyramid. The first thing most people lose sight of are the limits the ancient Egyptians had, great arcs and earthly circumferences were not in their tool box.

Best Regards,

B.A. Hokom



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/20/2007 05:23PM by Pistol.