Redrawn to 440 royal cubits.
revised royal cubit 20.632.
So you are adding 10 inches to Petrie's published figures for the base of G1. The previous attempt only required 8 inches to bring it inline so why have you abandoned circles for triangles?
Even if this is just another overnight attempt, and I suspect that it is, most surveyors are sympathetic to triangles. If the Egyptian did survey then I guess they would have discovered triangles too .... to set out the bases of each pyramid but not necessarily in relation to each other. Some say the topography prohibits it.
Finally what happened to G3?
