"That the Gizamids are propsoed as being symbolic of the 3 stars of Orion's Belt with the NIle symbolic of the MIlky Way is a Grand Unified Plan in my book. "

but it is Not THE Grand Unified Plan that he formultes in his most recent book "The Egypt Code".

But then you have shown us absolutely no inclination to look into the Ae's past for your proofs , so I'm not surprised that you do not appreciate how the plan has grown to include much much more than the Gizamids.

because to my thinking a grand unified plan, that has it's roots in their roots, is far more plausible than a limited transgenerational plan, focusing solely on Osiris , at Giza.

But at it's heart it still suggests incongruities with my Understanding of their beliefs.

I cannot begin to list all the aspects of AE beliefs, cosmology, language, calender making, surveying, architecture, technology, etc etc that I have been studying intensively over the last number of years. All to better appreciate the achievements of the OK.

the degree of infrastructure that they were able to maintain, the societal balance that they obviously had, the tranquil nature of what they deemed ideal. That is what I care about. That is the lesson that we can all learn. That is how mankind can benefit from what they did. What do we learn if we so readily deny their achievements??

NOTHING

we learn that we are puppets, dupes, less than deserving of bread and water

I apologise if my passion on this topic is distracting

I could very well be wrong about RB being wrong. But he holds the same vision as I do of the people we are both seeking to understand.

You on the other hand, have given us nothing of the AE's themselves to weigh your theory with. You dismiss them as inconsequential. And we learn nothing of your LC either . And if there is nothing to weigh....there is nothing.

This my friend is an Egypt forum. it is fueled by evidence. You can exchange witticisms and insults, practise rhetoric, feign indignation, or whatever til yer blue in the face. it still doesn't go one inch towards you attempting to qualify your theory.

You won't even offer a simple opinion on how you think a theory should be vetted.


Warwick









" I have always found that the main obstacle to free
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."

Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019