Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 11, 2024, 9:52 pm UTC    
January 12, 2008 02:18PM
"SC: Have you even read Bauval/Hancock's "Keeper of Genesis (Message of the Sphinx - US)". You do not think Bauval is - to use your expression - "assuming outside intervention and/or direction"? Clearly, you are completely unfamilliar with his work and his theory (hypothesis). "

you have got to be kidding me.slap:

I. I own each and every one of his books. I even own the British and NA editions where those editions are different. IN addition of have sought to read every source that he quotes in each of his books. In addition I have copies of hoards of Papers that discuss dfifferent aspects of the OCT

2. for a number of Years Robert was a regular poster here. he vetted most of his ideas via discussions here. As a regular at that time I was heavily involved in those discussions.

3. I have discussed many of the questions that Robert raised with Robert himself via email.

4. I have been priviledged to have as my colleagues many of the experts from many fields who were key to dispelling many of Robert's conclusions. Equally I have been privildged to know and debate with most of his key supporters as well. One of em even sent me a copy of the Egypt Code at a time when I was short of cash

5. I have been arduously studying AE Glphs and language for the past number of years PRIMARILY to better understand the PT's , the contents of which are key to understanding the beliefs that are the WHY behind RB's OCT

and as a summation. I notice you only cite one of Robert's books. Obviously you have not read them all otherwise you would be aware that the original OCT is nothing like where it stands today. That is because RB was forced to accept that some of his conclusions were probably incorrect.

IOW's he recognises the verification, corroboration and falsification requirements that I cited elsewhere.

Personnaly I await with baited breath Robert's next adjustment, and only hope his health does not prevent him from carrying on his research. Bt the time he gets it right I may just be well versed enough to debate the fine points with him on a more equal footing

He is an fine example to any theorist of how one should approach the task at hand..


Right or Wrong


Warwick


" I have always found that the main obstacle to free
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."

Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019
Subject Author Posted

a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 11, 2008 02:07PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 11, 2008 03:53PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 11, 2008 04:11PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 05:47AM

Re: a question re methodology

Don Barone January 12, 2008 07:32AM

Re: a question re methodology

Greg Reeder January 12, 2008 01:19PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 01:24PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 01:28PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 06:53PM

Re: a question re methodology

Greg Reeder January 12, 2008 02:17PM

Re: a question re methodology

C Wayne Taylor January 11, 2008 04:15PM

Re: a question re methodology

Jammer January 11, 2008 04:36PM

Re: a question re methodology

Chris Tedder January 11, 2008 05:05PM

Re: a question re methodology

Jammer January 11, 2008 05:08PM

Re: a question re methodology

Chris Tedder January 11, 2008 05:18PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 02:42PM

Re: a question re methodology

cladking January 11, 2008 09:27PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 02:46PM

Re: a question re methodology

Jammer January 12, 2008 02:46PM

Re: a question re methodology

Don Barone January 11, 2008 05:49PM

Re: a question re methodology

Greg Reeder January 11, 2008 10:41PM

Re: a question re methodology

Don Barone January 12, 2008 06:59AM

then humour Me this once...

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 02:35PM

Re: then humour Me this once...

Don Barone January 12, 2008 05:59PM

Re: then humour Me this once...

Greg Reeder January 12, 2008 06:32PM

Re: a question re methodology

Chris Tedder January 12, 2008 01:54PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 01:58PM

Re: a question re methodology

cladking January 11, 2008 04:58PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 02:32PM

Re: a question re methodology

MJ Thomas January 11, 2008 06:51PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 12:56PM

Re: a question re methodology

Pistol January 11, 2008 10:16PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 02:41PM

Re: a question re methodology

Pistol January 17, 2008 08:19PM

Re: a question re methodology

Clive January 12, 2008 01:43AM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 01:00PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 01:09PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 01:26PM

Re: a question re methodology

Clive January 13, 2008 02:29PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 02:40PM

Re: a question re methodology

Clive January 13, 2008 11:07PM

Re: a question re methodology

Dave L January 12, 2008 01:25PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 01:38PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 01:56PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 02:18PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 06:38PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 06:57PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 07:42PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 08:21PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 08:56PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 09:10PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 09:21PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 09:36PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 10:26PM

Re: a question re methodology

Jammer January 13, 2008 11:15AM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 01:52PM

Re: a question re methodology

cladking January 13, 2008 02:24PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 13, 2008 05:26PM

Re: a question re methodology

cladking January 13, 2008 05:44PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 06:26PM

Re: a question re methodology

Dave L January 12, 2008 01:57PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 02:22PM

Re: a question re methodology

Don Barone January 12, 2008 06:10PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 07:01PM

interesting so far

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 03:04PM

Re: a question re methodology

Pete Clarke January 17, 2008 11:34AM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 18, 2008 03:24PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login