Quote

"SC: Have you even read Bauval/Hancock's "Keeper of Genesis (Message of the Sphinx - US)". You do not think Bauval is - to use your expression - "assuming outside intervention and/or direction"? Clearly, you are completely unfamilliar with his work and his theory (hypothesis)."

WLN: you have got to be kidding me.slap: ....That is because RB was forced to accept that some of his conclusions were probably incorrect. IOW's he recognises the verification, corroboration and falsification requirements that I cited elsewhere.

SC: So show me then - anywhere - that Robert Bauval has abandoned his impossible date of 10,500BC. He hasn't. Indeed, in his latest book The EGypt Code he moves it even further back in time to 11,500BC!! Show me anywhere he has abandoned the idea of "an invisible college" having a shadowy hand on prehistoric AE. Show me anywhere he has abandoned his idea of the Shemsu-Hor having passed enlightened knowledge down from remote antiquity. Even in his most recent debates here on HoM he proposes that the AE understood precession. Even here on HoM he does not dismiss the remote date of 11,500BC but simply sidesteps the issue by saying "it is a problem" but not a "killer blow to his theory" (or words to that effect).

Yes - I can see you really have your finger on the pulse here!

SC





Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/12/2008 06:39PM by creigs1707.