Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 11, 2024, 12:03 pm UTC    
January 12, 2008 09:10PM
Quote

WLN: ...the original OCT is nothing like where it stands today. That is because RB was forced to accept that some of his conclusions were probably incorrect.

AND...

WLN: In the begining the correlation with the Sphinx and Leo was deemed to be a key component of his theory. in Responce to those who did not accept this he wrote the following

[www.robertbauval.co.uk]

again. whether he is right or not is not the point of this discussion. the fact is that he dug deeper. he sought to proove himself correct via evidence.

SC: So, explain to me how he changed his theory "because RB was forced to accept that some of his conclusions were probably incorrect."? All I see from what you have referenced above is that Bauval sought further evidence to bolster his original hypothesis - not to change it because others forced him to accept it was "probably incorrect".

SC

Subject Author Posted

a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 11, 2008 02:07PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 11, 2008 03:53PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 11, 2008 04:11PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 05:47AM

Re: a question re methodology

Don Barone January 12, 2008 07:32AM

Re: a question re methodology

Greg Reeder January 12, 2008 01:19PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 01:24PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 01:28PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 06:53PM

Re: a question re methodology

Greg Reeder January 12, 2008 02:17PM

Re: a question re methodology

C Wayne Taylor January 11, 2008 04:15PM

Re: a question re methodology

Jammer January 11, 2008 04:36PM

Re: a question re methodology

Chris Tedder January 11, 2008 05:05PM

Re: a question re methodology

Jammer January 11, 2008 05:08PM

Re: a question re methodology

Chris Tedder January 11, 2008 05:18PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 02:42PM

Re: a question re methodology

cladking January 11, 2008 09:27PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 02:46PM

Re: a question re methodology

Jammer January 12, 2008 02:46PM

Re: a question re methodology

Don Barone January 11, 2008 05:49PM

Re: a question re methodology

Greg Reeder January 11, 2008 10:41PM

Re: a question re methodology

Don Barone January 12, 2008 06:59AM

then humour Me this once...

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 02:35PM

Re: then humour Me this once...

Don Barone January 12, 2008 05:59PM

Re: then humour Me this once...

Greg Reeder January 12, 2008 06:32PM

Re: a question re methodology

Chris Tedder January 12, 2008 01:54PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 01:58PM

Re: a question re methodology

cladking January 11, 2008 04:58PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 02:32PM

Re: a question re methodology

MJ Thomas January 11, 2008 06:51PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 12:56PM

Re: a question re methodology

Pistol January 11, 2008 10:16PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 02:41PM

Re: a question re methodology

Pistol January 17, 2008 08:19PM

Re: a question re methodology

Clive January 12, 2008 01:43AM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 01:00PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 01:09PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 01:26PM

Re: a question re methodology

Clive January 13, 2008 02:29PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 02:40PM

Re: a question re methodology

Clive January 13, 2008 11:07PM

Re: a question re methodology

Dave L January 12, 2008 01:25PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 01:38PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 01:56PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 02:18PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 06:38PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 06:57PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 07:42PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 08:21PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 08:56PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 09:10PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 09:21PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 12, 2008 09:36PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 10:26PM

Re: a question re methodology

Jammer January 13, 2008 11:15AM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 01:52PM

Re: a question re methodology

cladking January 13, 2008 02:24PM

Re: a question re methodology

Scott Creighton January 13, 2008 05:26PM

Re: a question re methodology

cladking January 13, 2008 05:44PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 06:26PM

Re: a question re methodology

Dave L January 12, 2008 01:57PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 02:22PM

Re: a question re methodology

Don Barone January 12, 2008 06:10PM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 07:01PM

interesting so far

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 03:04PM

Re: a question re methodology

Pete Clarke January 17, 2008 11:34AM

Re: a question re methodology

Warwick L Nixon January 18, 2008 03:24PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login