"Even proper 'alternative' theories are ones that explain the evidence in a new way. "

I agree completely

Robert Bauval's OCT is a perfect example, in that he seeks to answer the question why

you yourself have looked far beyond Giza ( and are still looking)to verify your theories regarding their geometrical accuity and awareness of certain constants.

You do not take umbrage when we ask our questions, you act.

"I think you are assuming that most alternative theories do not explain the evidence, when in actual fact the people who write them almost always think their theory explains the evidence better than the existing accepted interpretations."

PART 1:I am assuming nothing.

what Don, Clive and Scott are assuming is outside intervention and /or direction.

and to date none of them have even attempted to find evidence for ..whomever.

It is not our job to proove Whomever did NOT exist

PART 2: Then why do these theorists confine their research to the conclusions of Egyptologists rather than to a study of the evidence that led to those conclusions?

That they ignore ..often completely. For most of em... Khufu's Horizon is a singularity

to me that is an absurdity


warwick

" I have always found that the main obstacle to free
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."

Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019