Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

April 28, 2024, 4:53 am UTC    
November 30, 2007 08:26PM
Imagine the difficulty of moving a single stone weighing
a couple of tons an average of nearly 200' up. You have
nothing at your disposal except ropes, manpower, and per-
haps some animals according to orthodox belief.

Now multiply this by 2,500,000. That's two and a half mil-
lion stones raised to such a level.

The pyramid weighs around twelve billion pounds. That's
enough work that all 300,000,000 Americans could carry forty
pound to an altitude of around 200' to duplicate it. That's
like forty pounds up a forty story building. That's a whole
lot of work. Sure we could do it very easily and it should
not be that hard even for the ancients, but the problem is
they have to do this work all in the same place. It would
be like having a forty story building with 300,000,000 peo-
ple lined up waiting to carry their 40lbs. Even if the ancients
put together a thousand teams to haul stones how does anyone work
while tripping over one another? Do they have a ramp for every
team? Do aliens use beams to make the teams and stones smaller
and then reconstitute them at the top?

You can defend orthodoxy if you want but orthodoxy doesn't
appear to have a real theory for how these were built. The
evidence is extremely scant for all the hypotheses. It would
seem that any one that explained most of the facts and is most
easily proven or disproven should certainly get some attention.


____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.
Subject Author Posted

Esoteric question about glyph for "cataract".

cladking November 26, 2007 04:40PM

Re: Esoteric question about glyph for "cataract".

Lee November 27, 2007 09:09AM

Thank you very much Lee.

cladking November 27, 2007 05:16PM

Re: Thank you very much Lee.

cladking November 28, 2007 02:45PM

Facts should be gathered before theories are formed, not after

Anthony November 30, 2007 02:49PM

Observation, hypothesis, experiment, theory.

cladking November 30, 2007 04:18PM

Re: Observation, hypothesis, experiment, theory.

Anthony November 30, 2007 07:40PM

Re: Observation, hypothesis, experiment, theory.

cladking November 30, 2007 08:26PM

Re: Observation, hypothesis, experiment, theory.

Anthony November 30, 2007 08:58PM

Re: Observation, hypothesis, experiment, theory.

Warwick L Nixon December 02, 2007 12:21PM

Re: Observation, hypothesis, experiment, theory.

cladking December 02, 2007 01:35PM

Re: Observation, hypothesis, experiment, theory.

Warwick L Nixon December 02, 2007 02:00PM

Re: Esoteric question about glyph for "cataract".

Byrd November 28, 2007 10:26PM

Re: Esoteric question about glyph for "cataract".

cladking November 28, 2007 10:56PM

Re: Esoteric question about glyph for "cataract".

Byrd November 29, 2007 07:06PM

Re: Esoteric question about glyph for "cataract".

cladking November 29, 2007 08:28PM

Re: Esoteric question about glyph for "cataract".

cladking November 29, 2007 11:34PM

Re: Esoteric question about glyph for "cataract".

cladking November 30, 2007 04:24PM

Re: Esoteric question about glyph for "cataract".

Anthony November 30, 2007 07:42PM

Re: Esoteric question about glyph for "cataract".

cladking November 30, 2007 08:29PM

Geyser science

Anthony December 01, 2007 10:19AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login