> > The evidence is therefore very obvious and very
> > clear that space is nothing more than just
> > wavelength...But, of course, one needs to look at
> > true reality with from a frequency point of view vs. time!
>
> Once again, you have failed to provide any evidence at all for your assertions.
> When asked to provide evidence, you start a game that a 5-years old could play:

Once again, you still completely fail to understand and/or accept the evidence that has been provided to you! Based on the evidence that I have provided you, by exclusion, space is clearly just a wavelength since there is nothing else in it, no ether, no nothing...

> - Mommy, I happen to know that God is a mushroom.

Tommi boy, that is not even that funny!

> - How do you know that, dear?
> - Are you saying mushrooms don't exist?

Well, go ahead and try to prove to me that there is something else in the vaccum of space? You have no evidence of it, of course!

I am sorry that I may have bursted your bubble by calling a spade a spade, but all evidence points that space is only a wavelength since there is nothing else in it...

> I'm done with you on this subject. You've once again wasted everyones time on this. If
> Tolkien is to be believed, a little bit of daylight will take care of that problem.

Yet, you continue to argue with me when it is obvious that I am right and you have no evidence to say it otherwise. Your argument to try to derail my position by stating that the Sun was not a wavelength was a boggus argument and lame at best, because I was not talking about any of the actual object forms in space but space itself...

wirelessguru1

BTW, object forms are standing waves due to the forces involved...