Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 8, 2024, 12:49 pm UTC    
May 25, 2005 03:31PM
> Since you have provided absolutely no evidence supporting this statement, it is a
> belief.

Amazing how your "logic" works! The evidence is all around you anywhere and everywhere you look...BTW, visible light is also a wavelength...

> You've been asked more than once to support this idea, but you've failed
> to do so every time.

No, I didn't fail to "support this idea", you just failed to accept it! Those are two different things...

Just answer me a very simple question: What is space expanding into and what was there before?

BTW, you still refuse to define what nothing and everything is and have yet to provide me with any evidence supporting your statement that nothing and everything existed before the so called "big bang"!!! smiling smiley

> > > I wonder if it is possible that there was legitimate anti-gravity one billionth
> > > of a second after the big bang and it was all destroyed by the existance of more
> > > gravitrons than anti-gravitons. Pure speculation admitedly, I guess there is no
> > > way to know.
> >
> > "There is no such thing as a "graviton" or an "anti-graviton" for that matter! You
> > need to support your statements. Please provide supported "evidence"? Simply stating
> > does not mean that they exist..."
>
> Granted, they're hypothetical but the idea works, especially with M-Theory.

I know that the "idea" works, but after all, in String/M (matrix) - Theory, everything is also just a vibrating string or a wave... smiling smiley

> I don't absolutely assume they exist, but I surely don't utterly dismiss them either,
> as you apparently do. It works for photons carrying electromagnetic force, why not
> gravitons carrying the gravitional force?

Yes, but photons are waves. The EM forces (intensity) are an integral part of those waves, just like wavelength, phase, etc, also are. Note that the EM forces are only experienced when the wave reaches a given target! So, if you also want to accept that gravity is a wave, then we can proceed with the conversation... smiling smiley

> They just haven't been detected yet because they carry sooooo little energy, but the
> search goes on. How can you be absolutely sure "there is no such thing as a graviton"?

Only because there is still no consensus on what gravity really is...But, once it is finally accepted to also be a wave, then everything will be confirmed to be waves just like I have been saying...

> > > Dark Energy, whatever it is, is really the only candidate for "anti-gravity" in the
> > > universe, but it is probably just a force that overpowers gravity like all the
> > > others.
> >
> > "It just happens that this "whatever it is" is really 73% of all reality !
> >
> > I love it how you just simply try to discard it!!!"
>
> How am I discarding it?

Because you say "whatever it is"!!!

It is a significant force (73% of all reality) that is expanding the Universe, so it has to be factored in and not just called whatever it is!!!

wirelessguru1
The Invisible Universe
Subject Author Posted

University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Dave L May 24, 2005 11:31AM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 24, 2005 12:04PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

MikeS May 24, 2005 03:05PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 24, 2005 03:21PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

MikeS May 24, 2005 03:23PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 24, 2005 03:42PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

MikeS May 24, 2005 04:08PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 24, 2005 04:25PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

MikeS May 24, 2005 05:19PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 24, 2005 06:24PM

Magnetic repulsion is *not* anti-gravity per se (n/t)

Stephen Tonkin May 24, 2005 11:53PM

So what is anti-gravity to you? (n/t)

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 12:07AM

not wanting to speak for Stephen

MikeS May 25, 2005 04:43AM

Re: not wanting to speak for Stephen

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 10:18AM

A farce NOT a force ! n/t

John Wall May 25, 2005 10:20AM

Re: not wanting to speak for Stephen

MikeS May 25, 2005 10:25AM

Re: not wanting to speak for Stephen

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 10:36AM

Re: not wanting to speak for Stephen

MikeS May 26, 2005 04:53AM

Re: not wanting to speak for Stephen

wirelessguru1 May 26, 2005 02:28PM

Tinfoil Cap

peski May 25, 2005 10:40AM

Re: Tinfoil Cap

laura May 25, 2005 10:45AM

Re: Tinfoil Cap

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 10:47AM

Re: Tinfoil Cap

laura May 25, 2005 10:56AM

Re: Tinfoil Cap

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 11:11AM

Re: Tinfoil Cap

laura May 25, 2005 11:30AM

Re: Tinfoil Cap

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 11:42AM

Re: Tinfoil Cap

Katherine Reece May 25, 2005 11:44AM

Re: Tinfoil Cap

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 10:46AM

Re: Tinfoil Cap

Stephen Tonkin May 26, 2005 12:51AM

Re: not wanting to speak for Stephen

Stephen Tonkin May 25, 2005 02:30PM

Re: not wanting to speak for Stephen

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 02:49PM

It's all old news.

kenuchelover May 24, 2005 06:55PM

Re: It's all old news.

wirelessguru1 May 24, 2005 07:10PM

Re: It's all old news.

MikeS May 25, 2005 05:56AM

Re: It's all old news.

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 10:23AM

Re: It's all old news.

MikeS May 25, 2005 10:26AM

Re: It's all old news.

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 10:37AM

scalar wave info

laura May 25, 2005 10:59AM

Re: scalar wave info

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 11:17AM

Re: scalar wave info

laura May 25, 2005 11:28AM

Re: scalar wave info

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 11:37AM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Voltaire May 25, 2005 09:06AM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Pete Clarke May 25, 2005 09:23AM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

MikeS May 25, 2005 09:51AM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 10:41AM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

bernard May 25, 2005 10:45AM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 10:54AM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Pete Vanderzwet May 25, 2005 01:57PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 02:15PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 02:20PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Pete Vanderzwet May 25, 2005 03:01PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 03:31PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Tommi Huhtamaki May 25, 2005 04:00PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

cicely May 25, 2005 04:23PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 04:35PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 04:39PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Tommi Huhtamaki May 26, 2005 02:24AM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Tommi Huhtamaki May 26, 2005 02:26AM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 04:23PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

lobo-hotei May 25, 2005 04:42PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 05:02PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Tommi Huhtamaki May 25, 2005 05:00PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 05:14PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Tommi Huhtamaki May 26, 2005 03:02AM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 26, 2005 01:10PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Tommi Huhtamaki May 26, 2005 02:09PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 26, 2005 02:23PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Pete Vanderzwet May 25, 2005 03:04PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 03:37PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Pete Vanderzwet May 25, 2005 08:38PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 25, 2005 10:21PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Pete Vanderzwet May 25, 2005 11:43PM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

Tommi Huhtamaki May 26, 2005 02:18AM

Re: University of Nottingham scientists develop genuine antigravity machine.

wirelessguru1 May 26, 2005 01:33PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login