> Since you have provided absolutely no evidence supporting this statement, it is a
> belief.
Amazing how your "logic" works! The evidence is all around you anywhere and everywhere you look...BTW, visible light is also a wavelength...
> You've been asked more than once to support this idea, but you've failed
> to do so every time.
No, I didn't fail to "support this idea", you just failed to accept it! Those are two different things...
Just answer me a very
simple question:
What is space expanding into and what was there before?
BTW, you still refuse to define what nothing and everything is and have yet to provide me with any evidence supporting your statement that nothing and everything existed before the so called "big bang"!!!
> > > I wonder if it is possible that there was legitimate anti-gravity one billionth
> > > of a second after the big bang and it was all destroyed by the existance of more
> > > gravitrons than anti-gravitons. Pure speculation admitedly, I guess there is no
> > > way to know.
> >
> > "There is no such thing as a "graviton" or an "anti-graviton" for that matter! You
> > need to support your statements. Please provide supported "evidence"? Simply stating
> > does not mean that they exist..."
>
> Granted, they're hypothetical but the idea works, especially with M-Theory.
I know that the "idea" works, but after all, in String/M (matrix) - Theory, everything is also just a vibrating string or a wave...
> I don't absolutely assume they exist, but I surely don't utterly dismiss them either,
> as you apparently do. It works for photons carrying electromagnetic force, why not
> gravitons carrying the gravitional force?
Yes, but photons are waves. The EM forces (intensity) are an integral part of those waves, just like wavelength, phase, etc, also are. Note that the EM forces are only experienced when the wave reaches a given target! So, if you also want to accept that gravity is a wave, then we can proceed with the conversation...
> They just haven't been detected yet because they carry sooooo little energy, but the
> search goes on. How can you be absolutely sure "there is no such thing as a graviton"?
Only because there is still no consensus on what gravity really is...But, once it is finally accepted to also be a wave, then everything will be confirmed to be waves just like I have been saying...
> > > Dark Energy, whatever it is, is really the only candidate for "anti-gravity" in the
> > > universe, but it is probably just a force that overpowers gravity like all the
> > > others.
> >
> > "It just happens that this "whatever it is" is really 73% of all reality !
> >
> > I love it how you just simply try to discard it!!!"
>
> How am I discarding it?
Because you say "whatever it is"!!!
It is a significant force (73% of all reality) that is expanding the Universe, so it has to be factored in and not just called whatever it is!!!
wirelessguru1
The Invisible Universe