I made a typo there, sorry. Graviton, not Gravitron, as the second example of the word in that sentence relates.
> You haven't provided a single reason for believing space is a wave, other than
> simply stating so.
"I said it (space) was a wavelength and not a wave! This is not a "believe" either, it is true reality..."
Since you have provided absolutely no evidence supporting this statement, it is a belief. You've been asked more than once to support this idea, but you've failed to do so every time.
> I wonder if it is possible that there was legitimate anti-gravity one billionth
> of a second after the big bang and it was all destroyed by the existance of more
> gravitrons than anti-gravitons. Pure speculation admitedly, I guess there is no
> way to know.
"There is no such thing as a "graviton" or an "anti-graviton" for that matter! You need to support your statements. Please provide supported "evidence"? Simply stating so does not mean that they exist..."
Granted, they're hypothetical but the idea works, especially with M-Theory. I don't absolutely assume they exist, but I surely don't utterly dismiss them either, as you apparently do. It works for photons carrying electromagnetic force, why not gravitons carrying the gravitional force? They just haven't been detected yet because they carry sooooo little energy, but the search goes on.
How can you be absolutely sure "there is no such thing as a graviton"?
> Dark Energy, whatever it is, is really the only candidate for "anti-gravity" in the
> universe, but it is probably just a force that overpowers gravity like all the others.
"It just happens that this "whatever it is" is really 73% of all reality !
I love it how you just simply try to discard it!!!"
How am I discarding it?