> The impression I get is that WG is waving his hand at reality (as he perceives it to be)
> in general, and saying, "There it is!".
Perception is, of course, part of it. I will
not deny my own subjective personal reality, otherwise I would be lying. But, there is a lot more to it than just my perception!
Are you also disputing the
undenial evidence that, for example, visible light is also just a wavelength (where each color has a very specific frequency and, therefore, associated wavelength)?
..or are you also disputing that I do not have enough evidence that the invisble Universe also exists? Yet most already fully accept the fact that the visible Universe in
only 4% of reality!!!
> IMO, a bit like waving a hand at the pyramids and saying, "There's your evidence for AE
> pi!"
I am sorry, but your analogy does not work here! First, I am not waving my hands, I am only pointing to people to look at the same "reality" from a different reference which is frequency vs. time. Second, my evidence of the Invisible Universe is based on the
fact that man-made invisible frequencies also work and can/do carry real information and data, therefore, they also exist! This is
not a very big leap of faith at all!!!
-wirelessguru1
