> The frequencies that control the mars landers are not invisible, or else we wouldn't be
> able to detect it, let alone use it to manipulate a machine hundreds of thousands of
> miles away.
Come on, they are invisible to the "average" observer without the instruments!
> Dark Energy is something entirely different. We can't detect it, we can only observe
> the influence it has on other objects.
Boggus argument! Obviously you just don't understand time encoded information and wide band spread spectrum!!! One simply cannot detect wide spread time encoded information/data without knowing the specific code or what one is looking for to start with since the energy is completely spread under the general noise floor...
> You're getting into quantum mechanics and particle physics here. A photon is both a
> particle and wave.
Even when a wave is "behaving" or "acting" like a particle does not mean that it is a particle. I would rather call it a standing wave...
> It all depends on how you observe them. In some respects a photon acts as a particle,
> for instance when registered by the light sensitive device in a camera.
That would be a "reaction" to the light wave action when the light wave interacts with the light sensitive device in the camera! Standard action/reaction...Again, we could go on and on with this, but ultimately there are no particles per say only standing waves that act like particles due to certain forces...
> In other respects, a photon acts like a wave, as when passing the camera optics. It is
> known in quantum physics as wave-particle duality, and observing photons as both
> particle and wave is correct. It isn't just one or the other.
I am sorry, but I certainly do
not subscribe to the perpetuation of this boggus interpretation of reality! I prefer a much more absolute interpretation of reality and not such an ambiguous one!
I call a spade a spade, a force a force, and a wave a wave...
For example, you cannot pick-up a photon and store it as a photon! There is no such thing as a light storage!!! LOL
For example, when you make light in a light bulb, it is all based on the action/reaction from the EM currents. The light bulb is
not storing light photons per say!!!
So, all the evidence supports my position...
+wirelessguru1
The Invisible Universe
