<HTML>Greg Reeder wrote:
>
> It works for me John.
I'd never thought of it in those terms previously; I've got what I'm convinced is an <i>absolute disproof</i> of Giza-Orion based on other arguments - however I'm not going to start seeking <i>acolades</i> until I'm more advanced. The big question is which journal to honour with the privilege; <i>Nature</i> or <i>Discussions in Egyptology</i> (Bauval joke !) ?
> Bauval is a very intelligent
> man. I am certain he could come up with arguments against our
> explanation and probably has already as Lehner's book has
> been aroung for awhile.
Well, he's good enough at shifting his position - like the sands of the Sahara !
> They all have so much invested in all this.
The <i>Giza Gravy Train</i> ?
> Their belief system is much like religious faith.
It's obvious who the <i>High Priests</i> are - and where the <i>believers</i> congregate !
> They believe and will do all kinds of mental gymnastics to
> reinforce that belief. In the end we all see what we want to see.
Giza-Orion could win a gold medal like Olga Korbut !
John</HTML>
