Graham Chase Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I asked a straight question.
> If you can't or won't answer in a meaningful way
> just say so !
I gave you the correct, proper and complete answer.
As a proponent of a theory, only you, as assumedly the most knowledgeable person on the subject, can predict the kind or form of evidence that would be produced by the culture in question. Of course, you'll need to know quite a bit about the culture in question in order to be able to predict where and in what form they would have preserved said evidence.
When you've studied enough real Egyptology, you'll see how these kinds of evidence have different forms for different theories, depending upon far too many factors for me to list here on a message board. It should be noted, though, that more coincidences will never serve as "evidence of intent". They only serve as evidence of your ability to find coincidences. Clearly you are quite good at that.
If you're saying it's too much work for you to do the job right, perhaps you should consider another avocation?
Anthony
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.