C Wayne Taylor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> > Showing that this quarter-base hits certain
> > points does not show that the AE created such
> a
> > surveying technique only that you have found
> a
> > close pattern to connect certain points.
>
> The "quarter-base" method reveals relationships,
> not necessarily the process used by the builders.

Quote

Here is more evidence that the pyramids were designed using what I am calling the "Quater-base" method.

[www.hallofmaat.com]

It helps to show relationships between similar distances but that is all. It is in no way proof of the AE design for these structures without independant evidence.


> > As far as the disputing this newest design
> method,
> > Don has already posted what came to my mind
> > immediately. The 2000RC "line of symmetry"
> was
> > accurate 1-2 cubits(0.10%) during all the
> diagrams
> > posted and yet having a miss of 2-4RC over
> > 410-440RC side length of G1 and G2 is now
> > acceptable in this latest attempt.
>
> see my reply to Don

It doesn't jive. On earlier posts you were arguing for high accuracy over 2000RC distances due to small errors of G1 side lengths over the arguments from others about lack of evidence for such accuracy in AE surveying techniques.
Now you are "allowing" for 2.3 and 3RC gaps due to "reasonable deviations for the time and circumstances".

IOW you have now changed sides of the accuracy debate for support of this new theory. Before it was high accuracy of 1/10%(2 RC off for 2000RC) but now 2.3-3RC off for less then 1/4th that distance is quite acceptable bringing the error up to 1% or more(still low but unacceptable if capable of only a 2RC error over a 2000RC distance. Afterall they could do multiple measuring and find the average, isn't that pretty close to what was said as support for the high accuracy? Why didn't that happen on these shorter distances that are now off by a larger margin then the whole of the previous ideas?

> > These "geometric" epiphanies all use a
> limited
> > number of points on almost exclusively the
> "Giza
> > Three" and satellite/queen pyramids without
> the
> > Sphinx, MT & VT, and causeways included
> with
> > these structures as a whole complex(three of
> > them).
>
> 1. You need to provide a valid argument that these
> other features must be included.

Two words--- Funerary complex.
In more words--- Three funerary complexes placed on a limited, uneven construction area with geometric constructions aligned to cardinal directions with additional structures included in the whole of each complex.
The main pyramid of each complex appears to need a clear view of north and east.


Regards,
Lobo-hotei
lobo

Treat the earth well, It was not given to you by your parents, It was loaned to you by your children.
Native American Proverb