Hi Hermione,

>> Hi C Wayne,
>
> > I submit that the
> > probability of of all the pyramids fitting
> the
> > "quarter-base" scheme is so remote that it
> would
> > be unreasonable to dismiss the idea.
> > Again, I will restate that I am open to the
> > possibility that the "quarter-base" method
> may be
> > a manifestation of an unknown underlying
> method.
>
> But you haven't shown that all pyramids fit the
> "quarter-base" scheme.

True.

In fact, you don't have
> such a scheme, because you're getting different
> fits for different pyramids.

I don't understand what you mean by "different fits".

All you've shown is
> that, if you draw enough arcs from the main
> pyramids, you can get intersects with (different)
> corners or apexes of the subsidiary pyramids.

I agree that given an infinite number of different arcs, an arc would intersect with every point.

> In fact, you have so many arcs from the main
> pyramid that it would probably be surprising if
> they didn't intersect.

I agree that it would probably be surprising if none interesected.



C. Wayne Taylor
Richmond, Virginia USA