Hi Don

> ... Those are reasonable deviations for the time
> and circumstances.
>
> Sorry Wayne forgive me but that is special
> pleading.

I disagree. "time and circumstances" = 2500 bce on the Giza plateau

> Using the original plan that started all of this
> the entire complex was only out 1/2 cubit and we
> were able to close that to almost perfection by
> changing a size just slightly.
>
> Sorry Wayne but your theory has been shown not to
> fit compared to other suggestions that take in the
> entire complex and which close more closely and
> accurately over much larger distances.

Regarding the "Chase" diagram:

1. It contains the "quarter-bases":

*	"A" = G2 SE corner to G1 2/4 East base.

*	Radius of "C" = G1 6/4 base (99.4%)

*	Radius of "D" = G2 11/4 base (100.3%).

*	Radius of "F" = G1 7.5/4 base. (101.4%)

*	"E" is derived from G3 mid-bases  =  G2 SE corner to G1 2/4 and 4/4 South Base.

2. The builders of G3 appear to have done a better surveying job and, as a result, the over all relational fit is better. It appears to be simply retro-fitted well.


C. Wayne Taylor
Richmond, Virginia USA