Spiros Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
Let's say you are
> on a hypothetical planet revolving around any one
> of these 6 stars. From it, you can see the other 2
> stars of the triad that relates to the
> pyramids(remember they are bright stats).

...but they are not next to each other as they appear to us one is 817 LY from Earth, the second is 1,340 LY and Mintaka is 915 LY.

It would
> thus make sense if being on any one of the 3
> pyramid apexes you could see any one of the other
> two apexes. It is like symbolically being able to
> see the two stars from one particular star.

Not at all and I don't imagine that the AE knew that a star was another sun, etc
>
> You ask if the ancients build three massive
> pyramids to point to a place? No, they didn't

Then why are you saying it points to x - by the way if to the NE it points to Heliopolis where does the opposite end point to?


> because it is more complex than that. But would it
> make more sense to say that they build three
> massive pyramids as tombs?


Yes as it is in line with their religion, culture and prior actions.