Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 3, 2024, 2:01 pm UTC    
September 27, 2010 12:20PM
Khazar-khum Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The plumbing needed for geysers is nowhere to be
> found in Giza. Even allowing for it to be
> destroyed over time, the lack of geyserite is
> telling.

CO2 geysers leave calcium carbonates and the like mostly.

There's really no evidence that there has ever been any comprehensive exploration under Giza. In very recent times Hawass has been looking at the Osiris Shaft but he's still only been able to explore the cave in the bottoim to about 75'. So far as I can determine the water under here has never been analyzed! There's a cave on the other side of the plateau that is mostly unmapped and unexplored.

There are numerous reports of tunnels and caves in rock cut tombs but no comprehensive exploration of any to my knowledge.

I said three years ago that all or nearly all future discoveries will point to water rather than ramps. So far this has been true. Hawass found a well at Saqquarra, a cave at Giza, and Collins found another cave at Giza.

Of course I cheated making this prediction since you can go back to the time that ramps became the common assumption and see that ever since almost all the evidence found has supported the idea of water rather than ramps.

Thios is most unlikely to change ever if they used water rather than ramps.


____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.
Subject Author Posted

CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Jammer September 24, 2010 11:51AM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Rick Baudé September 24, 2010 11:59AM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

cladking September 24, 2010 01:39PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Tommi Huhtamaki September 24, 2010 02:49PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

cladking September 27, 2010 11:43AM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Anthony September 24, 2010 04:44PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Rick Baudé September 24, 2010 04:54PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Anthony September 24, 2010 08:00PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

cladking September 27, 2010 11:47AM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Warwick L Nixon September 27, 2010 12:24PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Byrd September 25, 2010 07:01PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Khazar-khum September 25, 2010 09:26PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Pistol September 25, 2010 09:45PM

Question for CK

Khazar-khum September 26, 2010 08:18PM

Re: Question for CK

cladking September 26, 2010 08:55PM

Translation

Anthony September 27, 2010 03:52AM

Re: Question for CK

Warwick L Nixon September 27, 2010 10:36AM

Re: Question for CK

cladking September 27, 2010 11:12AM

Re: Question for CK

Warwick L Nixon September 27, 2010 12:05PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

cladking September 27, 2010 12:23PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Warwick L Nixon September 27, 2010 12:27PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

cladking September 27, 2010 12:20PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

cladking September 27, 2010 12:11PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Warwick L Nixon September 27, 2010 12:17PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

cladking September 27, 2010 12:37PM

I'll approach just one paragraph

Warwick L Nixon September 27, 2010 10:21AM

**Thread closure**

Hermione September 27, 2010 12:45PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.