cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------


>
> But we’re not counting scuffs on a coin


if we were atttempting to assess coin circulation that WOULD be considered


>or uses of
> the letter “z”.


seeing as your theory is based on lnaguage interpretation I'd say the frequency of a single letter, the various pronunciations of that letter, and the existence of that letter would be considered.


> We’re looking at a 6 ½ million
> ton pyramid and a little information about the
> people who built it.


you have the option of looking at more information but you constantly decline it.


> Reverse engineering is
> about clues that were left not the odds of those
> clues existence. The odds against any means of
> building these or their very existence are simply
> astronomical.


The fact disputes that unfounded observation


>Yet there they sit in all their
> glory without a single sloped line visible


why should there be?



>amid a
> cemetery filled with people who were not ramp
> builders.

"here lies Poorhotep...he was NOT a ramp builder" sounds silly to me

Why don't you go dig up your local graveyard and do a study on the careers of the bodies buried therein..or read the tombstones...'loving father' 'devoted husband' is all you'll find


> Now’s the time to ask about odds. What
> are the odds they could have used ramps and left
> no clue of it?

not very high...there are two quarries filled with.....fill,not sand...where do you suppose that fill came from?? and why is it there?


but let me ask you a statistical question...why have you never shared your logistics re the impossiblity of raising Blocks primarily via inclines?

you just state it as being impossible. have you ever actually worked it out??

and if you have why have you never shared it here?

I'll give you a big head start...when G1 was 50 metres high it allready contained 80% of it's final volume

can you see any logistical problem with a ramp 50 metres high?

Some real numbers would be nice...not ones plucked out of real air for argument's sake






Warwick





" I have always found that the main obstacle to free
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."

Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/27/2010 11:12AM by Warwick L Nixon.