Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 3, 2024, 8:11 am UTC    
September 27, 2010 12:11PM
Byrd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Geyser evidence is very hard to hide. You have
> holes in the ground, surrounded by dissolved stone
> of a certain formation. The water doesn't just
> bounce up, it flows down in rivers and streams,
> leaving mineralized deposits all over the ground:

I believe this is the most disturbed site on the face of the planet and that disturbance didn't end until the beginning of the FIP. Not only was the primordial mound hauled away but even the soil was carted off eventually.

> Okay... show us the drill that was capable of
> drilling 40 foot holes. Having lived in West
> Texas, I'm somewhat familiar with drilling... and
> I'm familiar with the sand-using drills the
> ancient Egyptians had.
>
> So, please show us links to the kind of drills
> they had that could go down deeper than 5 feet.

There are some long drill shafts that survive of sufficient size but I doubt they have a means to attach to another shaft in evidence.

Bronze was pretty valuable over several periods of human history and there's great question in my mind that such equipment would survive such periods as well as wars, floods, fires, and the numerous other calamities that befall all the things made by man.

> Sorry. It's not a "given" until you show us
> evidence (pictures) of people constructing things
> using counterweights. There are any number of
> pictures from Egypt of that period. Please link
> to one that shows counterweights being used.

I think most of it relates to building things with counterweights. From Osiris standing in a djed with an ankh (geyser) on his head to the bull of heaven with a djed under his chin. Even the duties of the earthly ennead are laid out to extend the primordial mound so the king can live forever.

> So... they wait till the geyser goes off and catch
> the result in buckets? Geyser water splashes
> everywhere, you know.

I believe the water was caught by the Mehet Weret cow which channeled the celestial waters. Khenti irty was the God of this device and he had two eyes. The lower one was covered with a djed over which the Gods stood. The djed was aimed to hit the upper one.

> That means the sun rides in the sky in a boat.
> And at night it goes underneath the earth where in
> order to get to the other side, gods have to fight
> off the giant snake of the underworld.
>
> I'm pretty sure we can prove that the Earth is a
> globe and that there aren't snakes eating it on
> the other side of the world.

I don't believe this idea was intended as part of the PT. There are very few elements of it in the PT though it is entirely impossible that this isn't overly far from their beliefs at that time. It's not superstition which I believe doesn't appear in the PT but metaphor. I believe they were just expressing the concepts in their own words. It appears like metaphor to modern people because we think differently and because the literal meanings are so hard to believe.

> If you want to support your position, you have to
> find large stretches of mineralized drainage,
> other cold water geyesers in the area (or evidence
> of them), evidence of drills that could reach
> through bedrock to a depth of over 40 feet, and
> mechanisms for lifting water over 32 feet in
> height.
>
> And plumbing.

Almost any of this would almost constitute proof of the theory and the evidence they didn't exist would be proof the theory is wrong.




____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.
Subject Author Posted

CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Jammer September 24, 2010 11:51AM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Rick Baudé September 24, 2010 11:59AM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

cladking September 24, 2010 01:39PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Tommi Huhtamaki September 24, 2010 02:49PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

cladking September 27, 2010 11:43AM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Anthony September 24, 2010 04:44PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Rick Baudé September 24, 2010 04:54PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Anthony September 24, 2010 08:00PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

cladking September 27, 2010 11:47AM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Warwick L Nixon September 27, 2010 12:24PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Byrd September 25, 2010 07:01PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Khazar-khum September 25, 2010 09:26PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Pistol September 25, 2010 09:45PM

Question for CK

Khazar-khum September 26, 2010 08:18PM

Re: Question for CK

cladking September 26, 2010 08:55PM

Translation

Anthony September 27, 2010 03:52AM

Re: Question for CK

Warwick L Nixon September 27, 2010 10:36AM

Re: Question for CK

cladking September 27, 2010 11:12AM

Re: Question for CK

Warwick L Nixon September 27, 2010 12:05PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

cladking September 27, 2010 12:23PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Warwick L Nixon September 27, 2010 12:27PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

cladking September 27, 2010 12:20PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

cladking September 27, 2010 12:11PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

Warwick L Nixon September 27, 2010 12:17PM

Re: CK Geysers, lets look at probability math...

cladking September 27, 2010 12:37PM

I'll approach just one paragraph

Warwick L Nixon September 27, 2010 10:21AM

**Thread closure**

Hermione September 27, 2010 12:45PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.