cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warwick L Nixon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > But he isn't making a statement of fact, he
> is
> > summing up all that is known about the
> possibility
> > of ramps. As such his assessment is
> extremely
> > accurate.
>
> Again you are supporting the company line that it
> mustta been ramps.


The only contention I am supporting is that the jury is still out
>
> I've seen this evidence that is being summed up
> and it works almost better as an argument against
> ramps.

How long were you at Giza?

> Worse yet is that the physical evidence
> argues against it


is the physical evidcen you mention different from the other evidence you mentioned in the sentence before?

" and the builders neglected to
> ever mention they built one or used one.


The builders neglected to tell us anything about their methods...that's why we are having these discussions


> They
> neglected to have any overseers of ramps


you mean they neglected to mention them..judt like everything else


>or even a
> whip maker or two.


Whip maker?? do you actually think that they used whips?


>
> You might be right he shouldn't say what I'd
> expect but for the life of me I can't imagine how
> anyone would have ever thought it must have been
> ramps.




again you repeat this 'Must have been Ramps" nonsense


>The evidence against ramps has mounted
> more quickly than the evidence supporting them and
> back when there was no evidence why assume it was
> ramps? Why assume they used a very highgly
> inefficient means?


Why assume Cladking is ever going to make sense?



Warwick




" I have always found that the main obstacle to free
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."

Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019