Are you talking about your cubit/Saqqara perimeter post?

I've answered it numerous times. Anywhich way you look at the accuracy is better than 0.2% iirc. I provided references. I also provided a whole chapter in the book devoted to "Methodology, analysis and discussion of mathematics" that covers the methodological approach to interpreting data of this sort. It is a question of accuracy/precision/tolerances and understanding data within a proper cultural context. See page 45.

I have done my part. If people cannot accept mainstream orthodox facts then that is not my problem.

That's my last word on this thread.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/06/2010 01:59PM by Dave L.