The abscence of evidence is not evidence of abscence. If we had a complete picture of the ancient world then there would be no need to search for more evidence. The phrase 'dare not' was not mine, but that of a famous Egyptologist. I think you know what was meant. My use of this phrase was not meant to be a negative comment against Egyptologists. I think experts do well not to stray out of their particular area expertise. In this case my article was sent to several Egyptologists ahead of publication on the internet. All but one replied, and all said they thought it was interesting, including yourself.
Readers should know you suggested that I should launch a website and then raise this as a topic for discussion via a link. Your comments are useful for any who happen to visit your website without a knowledge of the ancient world. Your comments highlight that I am proposing something new, and that there is no other evidence for my proposal. My hypothesis stands or falls on the new evidence presented. I thought it was right, however, to highlight that others have promoted the view that the ancient Egyptians were aware of precession. In my case I was not even considering precession when the number 25,920 emerged from my spatial analysis.
If a farmer finds an old object when ploughing a field, it is appropriate to take it to the experts to find out if it is something of value or rubbish. Similarly, I sought the help of Egyptologists who were kind enough to offer good advice. An Egyptologist kindly sent a copy of my article to Professor Rainer Stadelmann ahead of publication on the internet. Professor Stadelmann is, of course,the top expert on the pyramids at Dahshur. The proper way forward, in due course,is to submit a paper to a journal. All who help to improve my case will be acknowledged.