Hi Jammer ...

I tend to agree with this. Any claim of an accurate solution to Giza (my own included) where pinpoint accuracy is demonstrated must eventually come to grips with the fact that THE PYRAMIDS ARE NOT EXACTLY SQUARE ! Any final solution has to eventually describe in detail why the shortfall over a simple short distance of about 440 cubits. It always haunts me in the end and I continually look for reasons for this. I think we have found a possible solution for the angle of G3 but untill we can demonstrate why The Great Pyramid is not exactly square all solutions and again I have to include mine, fall a little short of the mark. Jiri assuming an average IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH AT Giza !!!

If we allow "them" accuracy of fractions of a cubit then how could they have failed to measure 440 or 439.88 or 439.82 accurately four times ? Even if the [90 degree] angle were out they should have been able to close the square by simply measuring the 4 sides exactly. Jiri please don't think this a condemnation of your (and my) work but in the final analysist we must eventually explain this simple descrepancy.

Best Regards
Don Barone



"There is nothing as impenetrable as a closed mind"
and ..." if everything is a coincidence what is the point of studying or measuring or analyzing anything ?" db



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 07/25/2008 03:50AM by Hermione.