Hermione Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Er, no. As I said previously, the review cannot
> be discredited on those grounds. The substance of
> the review consists of a discussion of this
> account of Schwaller's work and those aspects of
> Schwaller's personality that might have impinged
> on, or influenced, his work. That is not the same
> thing as a "classic character assassination".
Not so. Schwaller didn't kill, or rape anybody. He may have been unpleasant to deal with, I don't know, because I know next to nothing about him. His personality that is. But I did see a couple of instances on his geometric analysis of AE artifacts given by Tompkins in his Secrets of the GP. Those seem rather convincing,and apparently there are many more. Was Schwaller not the first to recognize that the Sphinx sports typical features of water erosion? Is that not something on its own? Clearly, Schwaller de Lubicz was not a one-dimensional man. The article faon the other hand is one-dimensional. It fails to criticize Schwaller's scientific work by dwelling on personal aspects. The author even criticizes a friend of Schwaller for not rejecting his theories after rejecting his friendship. That an obvious wrongful connection of personal to impersonal.