Byrd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jiri Mruzek Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----

> Given that the Ancient Egyptians didn't use
> decimals, and didn't use fractions very often, I'd
> like to see some examples from one of their math
> papyruses that show they were doing this sort of
> thing as well as examples of important objects
> (temple complex design, etc) that show this was
> something their culture was using.

You mean Egyptian "Mathematics for uneducated dummies?
No relation to the secret knowledge guarded by the temples.
Besides where would I get those papyri? You know there are
none available.

> The Gizamids weren't a 4 year project... they were
> built over a span of 80-100 years, which means
> they had several lead architects. Each pharaoh
> built more than one pyramid (the satellite
> pyramids, for example) and other pharaohs built
> more than one large pyramid.
>
> Could you show other examples showing that this
> same sort of thing holds true in other royal
> cemetaries?

None of the other locations have been measured
well enough to enable a chair archaeology project
of the sort. For that matter, latest measurements of
Giza are not made available either. That's why I can't
expand the study to other structures. So stop taunting
me over scarcity of data for which I am not responsible.
Guess who is?

> Remember that science relies on a "null
> hypothesis" -- the "if this is true then we will
> see THIS pattern elsewhere; otherwise this idea is
> wrong."

The null hypothesis does not really apply to a single
subject of study so complex and exact that ANY chance of
coincidence is relegated to the impossible category.
This is the case with the grand plan of Giza.
You have to switch to the normal way of thinking,
whereby "the agreement of measurements (to an exact
idea)is so exact, we must suppose it was intentional.

> In order to knock the "Null hypothesis" aside (the
> idea that you've hunted till you found a
> coincidence) you wil have to show this pattern
> going on elsewhere and using math that we know the
> Egyptians used (no decimal points.)

The issue is greater than Egypt. It threads down from
prehistory, La Marche, southern France, specifically.
I have the studies available. One such study deals with
precession. No- it is not my study, it is an essay by
the "cavemen" on Pi, Phi, and precession.
[www.vejprty.com] What are the odds?

And besides, like you are trying supress my discovery,
other research similar to mine is suppressed as well.
Schwaller de Lubicz studies on Pi and Phi in Egyptian
structures are one example. Those were rejected, but
look how my studies bear Lubicz out.
And, look how my theory validates the approach
by J.A.R. Legon to Giza's layout, and his concept of
Royal Cubit.