Jiri Mruzek Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> To be exact, 1732.05 cubit. That 0.05 cubit makes
> a big difference. Only then do various results
> become impressively calibrated.
Given that the Ancient Egyptians didn't use decimals, and didn't use fractions very often, I'd like to see some examples from one of their math papyruses that show they were doing this sort of thing as well as examples of important objects (temple complex design, etc) that show this was something their culture was using.
The Gizamids weren't a 4 year project... they were built over a span of 80-100 years, which means they had several lead architects. Each pharaoh built more than one pyramid (the satellite pyramids, for example) and other pharaohs built more than one large pyramid.
Could you show other examples showing that this same sort of thing holds true in other royal cemetaries?
Remember that science relies on a "null hypothesis" -- the "if this is true then we will see THIS pattern elsewhere; otherwise this idea is wrong."
In order to knock the "Null hypothesis" aside (the idea that you've hunted till you found a coincidence) you wil have to show this pattern going on elsewhere and using math that we know the Egyptians used (no decimal points.)