mstower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It is not clear from the names of these appendices
> how much Creighton is still trying to make of the
> electoral episode. Close attention to the law as
> it stood in 1807—statute and case law—suggests
> that Vyse did not act unlawfully. Creighton
> contributed (more vehemently than cogently) to
> discussions in which this point was raised, so he
> is perfectly well aware of it.
>
> In any case, we may on past experience fairly
> discount Creighton’s implied promises as bluster.
>
> M.

One thing we may certainly expect is a reprise of his attempt to make something of the facetiae of the Prussian flâneur Hermann von Pückler-Muskau, which has (in the usual way) already been answered at length. A notable exposé of his cluelessness is this one.

M.