cladking Wrote:
>
> I was expecting opinion on the translation "makes
> the stone grow".
Again do you not understand how you and your ideas are viewed in the real world?
>
> I don't consider most of what you say relevant to
> this topic.
Most of it pointed to your not having a foundation of any kind to make the initial comments you did:
""I suspect that #513d is translated incorrectly; "makes the lapis lazuli grow".""
Now how would you suspect that? You cannot read the language and know precious little about the actual AE religion, language or culture.
"I believe it is probably meant to say "makes the stone turn (the color) turquois (blue)" or more accurately "makes the blue deposition increase on stone (specific)"
"I believe" yes and the problem with all of your made up stuff over the last 15 years...
>I'd be interested in opinions on the strength of the existing translation. No matter how one interprets the PT the existing translation seems quite out of character >for the authors.
Like you would know what the authors' meant? How? Remember you dismissed all aspect of the AE civilization and replaced it with a non-evidenced and rather silly versions that has them talking to animals....and having 'ancient science' and 'ancient language' things you 'forgot' to provide any evidence that they existed.
You have no standing