Warwick L Nixon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ok I think I put to much meaning into your
> reference to geometry.

With due respect, Mr. Nixon, methinks you just wanted to argue the point from your throne of superiority 'down to me', because you thought you could.


>
> Of course the two square rectangle comes into
> play. But I really think it more a matter of a
> basic symmetry, as you rightly
> state...Balance...that works so well with those
> other basic denominators...the Two Egypts, and
> Duality in general.
>
> yet the demands on the artist and/or architect ie
> the means whereby he balances his work requires
> very little in the way of calculation.
>
> TTBOMK in any relief that clearly has two
> receptive or reflective sides, the key components
> are those in the middle that are singular. I'll
> venture what might very well be a completely wrong
> metaphor vis a vis interpretation. That which is
> singular in this relief is the Noun/s, that which
> is mirrored is/are the Verb/s. Comments???

Reflective yes, receptive no, they are already conceived and perceived. As to the rest, I wish you would

Amen
Charlotte
>
> What do you make of the bird at top? Ibis,
> Vulture, or something yet again???
>
> Confuscious didn't know that he could have been
> talking about the AE's..else he would have said
> <<a picture "IS" a thousand words
> >>:waves:
>
>
> warwick
>
>
>
>
> To the Best of My knowledge and In My Honest
> Opinion