Don Barone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ronald Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Scott,
> >
> >
> > What if tomorrow an archaeologist finds a
> second
> > satellite pyramid alongside Khafre's pyramid
> ,
> > changing your 'arrangement of the satellites'
> in
> > 3-2-4 ? This is not improbable at all.
>
> Speculative nonsense.
>
>
No, it's an evidence-based response. It has happened in the past... recently, in fact.
>
> > Ancient buildings were used for quarrying
> purposes
> > regularly and/or simply vanished/deteriorated
> in
> > the course of time. Basements of vanished
> > monuments are discovered regularly.
>
> Please name at least three at Giza please.
>
Why three? Because two have already been found?
Even one... the recently discovered satellite pyramid of Khufu... completely destroys your objection.
> >
>
> I am curious why so called authorities can spout
> meaningless statements and never have to back it
> up.
If you don't understand the meaning, then you probably aren't able to judge whether that meaning is or is not supported.
In fact, it is supported. Perhaps you could ask for references and then actually read them?
>
> Hopefully the next generation will be like my
> daughter (going into 3rd year university,
> Humanites course) who finds certain posters on
> this board offensive to what and how she is being
> taught.
Intellectual relativism, probably. Worthless to a serious researcher of fact, science and history. It's a shame young people these days aren't, at the very least, taught critical thinking skills by their parents. It leaves them open to a plethora of meaningless arguments, emotional pleadings, and unsubstantiated debate tactics... and they are not equipped with the basic intellectual tools to understand how they're being duped.
Anthony
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.