creigs1707 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hope I don't get your thread closed down with my
> 'alternative' views.
>
> The Pi constant (at least the first 3 digits) may
> be much more apparent than anyone here has ever
> considered. Let's consider the satellite pyramids
> within my Giza Precession Wheel. (It's okay - I
> am not trying to hijack the thread, merely trying
> to demonstrate something that may or may not be
> significant and I am gone):
>
> Pyramid ........# Satellites
>
> Menkaure................3
> Khafre.....................1
> Khufu......................4
>
> 3-1-4 implies a circle and this is how I came up
> with the Giza Precession Wheel:
>
> Yes, I understand the AEs used a decimal number
> system but did not use decimal fractions.
> Nevertheless, in the arrangement of the satellites
> here we have this 3-1-4 mathematical beacon.


Scott,


What if tomorrow an archaeologist finds a second satellite pyramid alongside Khafre's pyramid , changing your 'arrangement of the satellites' in 3-2-4 ? This is not improbable at all. Ancient buildings were used for quarrying purposes regularly and/or simply vanished/deteriorated in the course of time. Basements of vanished monuments are discovered regularly. 3-1-4 does not imply a circle. It just indicates that, at this moment, 8 sattelite pyramids are known/visible. All the rest is a product from your little phantasy-world.

And tell me, how can the subsidiary pyramid south from Khafre form a 'circle' with the satellites from Menkaoere and Khufu, through wich you 'came up with the Giza Precession Wheel' ?

By the way, '3-1-4' could as well be '4-1-3', which is not pi. It simply depends on what you WANT to see/believe. And that is the whole point. Giza obviously beyond any doubt was/still is an archaeologically proven grave-yard where pharaoh's and other important people were buried, nothing more, nothing less.


Ronald.






Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/28/2007 02:02PM by lobo-hotei.