You've not seen many business models if they all predict success. I've seen loads, some good, some bad, some which can show success some which can show failure. Once again you are setting up your strawman arguement. Only this time you are just plain trying to avoid giving an answer. This discussion has been going on for a few days now. If you haven't found anything to support your possition it probably doesn't exist.

You say
"The point is that it is YOU who doesn't have any evidence! You just simply cannot extrapolate any particular business model (successful or not!) in the aircraft industry towards the commercialization of space. This is like trying to compare Apples with Oranges and for some reason you just cannot see this!!!"

I have shown you a very successful model. That of the aircraft industry. Why are they different? You have failed to show this again. Stop avoiding answering the question by just pretending that it doesn't fit I have gone over why it fits (ie commercial enterprise and competion bringing the price down). It is YOU who have failed to show how it isn't relevent. Just saying it isn't, as you are doing above, doesn't make it so. SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE YOU ARE BASING THIS ASSUMTPION ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!

You will probably say again something like this again

"You are the one who is "speculating" when you suggest here that you can use an aircraft industry business model and apply it directly to the commercialization of space! Well, I will continue to tell you that this argument is ridiculous at best!!!"

I am not speculation though. I am applying a logical business model, that has worked previously in simlar industries in the past. You STILL haven't managed to show how it isn't relevent.

And as for this silly point B arguement. If that is true, how did we ever get to the moon?