Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 7, 2024, 6:11 pm UTC    
June 20, 2005 03:03PM

Many early psychiatric terms are meaningless or had their meaning substantially changed. Autism is not eccentricity, reclusiveness or geekiness, as has been suggested. Asperger's syndrome is quite different from true autism. Autism was first officially noticed in the 40s, after the preservative was in use. I've already posted links on Asperger's syndrome.

There has been an explosion in autism since the preservative was first developed. During the 15 years when this stuff was injected into millions of young children (1989-2003), the cases of autism have jumped from one in 2500 to one in 160; for boys it's one in 80. As I mentioned the other day, new evidence is beginning to show a drop in the number of cases of autism in states where Thimerosal is banned.

And now some in the US congress are actively trying to push legislation to prevent drug companies from being held accountable, which frankly further suggests someone knows what's been going on. Meanwhile, we are exported this stuff all over the world to countries with no previous autism, who are now seeing children stricken after vaccinations....IMO, it's important for all of us to know ALL the facts. The conduct and cowardice of the news media has been shameful.
Subject Author Posted

Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Joanne June 17, 2005 10:50AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Sue June 17, 2005 02:52PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Katherine Reece June 17, 2005 03:03PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Joanne June 17, 2005 05:36PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

John Wall June 17, 2005 05:54PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Anthony June 17, 2005 06:27PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Rick June 17, 2005 06:34PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Joanne June 18, 2005 07:50AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Anthony June 18, 2005 05:25PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Joanne June 19, 2005 10:16AM

Has anybody knowledge of regional distributions (Ausbergers syndrome issue?)

kenuchelover June 18, 2005 01:04AM

Re: Has anybody knowledge of regional distributions (Ausbergers syndrome issue?)

Joanne June 18, 2005 07:59AM

Re: Has anybody knowledge of regional distributions (Ausbergers syndrome issue?)

Joanne June 18, 2005 03:00PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Rick June 18, 2005 08:57AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

RickB June 18, 2005 09:05AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Joanne June 18, 2005 02:54PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Rick June 18, 2005 07:23PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Joanne June 19, 2005 10:18AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

Joanne June 20, 2005 10:54AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

Doug Weller June 20, 2005 01:44PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

Joanne June 20, 2005 03:03PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

Pete Clarke June 21, 2005 03:08AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

Joanne June 21, 2005 07:51AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

Pete Clarke June 21, 2005 09:55AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

Joanne June 21, 2005 11:09AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update, Pubmed

Bart June 21, 2005 03:00PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

bernard June 25, 2005 01:18PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

bernard June 20, 2005 04:45PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login