Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 7, 2024, 11:16 am UTC    
June 18, 2005 01:04AM
I glanced at the book site linked to, and the first thing that struck me was a possible correlation between the increase in austism and changing marriage patterns.

Firstly, I assume everybody here on the forum is familiar with the term "geek" (AKA nerd, etc). It typically refers to somebody who is bright, likely to understand technology & science, but is often lacking in the finer social nuances (to say the least.... oftimes they're viewed as being socially inept). A tendency towards behavioral oddities is often sometimes noted.

A number of us here probably fall into this general catagory.

Cue background: Bluntly, back in the old days, "geeks" often didn't get married, and rarely married each other (by way of compromising only a small fraction of the population, plus poor social skills). But nowadays, with the establishment of major technological enterprise zones like California's "Silicon Valley", we see high concentrations of tech savvy people of both genders..... making good livings & socializing with people just as socially inept as themselves (where it's no longer such a handicap)..... with a resultant high incidence of geek-geek marriages.

Enter Ausbergers' syndrome, which has been characterized as a mild form of Austism. There is a VERY high incidence of Ausbergers (& autism proper) in Silicon Valley, to the point that it's been nicknamed "Ausbergers' Alley". It has been theorized that a genetic condition exists, which in mild form (partially recessive? multiple genes?) results in valued engineers & techies, in a stronger form gives you Ausbergers syndrome, and in the strongest form results in autism. Such theorists do NOT claim that all autism has the same causes, just that there is at the very least a genetic propensity towards autistic related behavior in certain people.

It strikes me that such things as Silicon Valley, or the rise of the Information Age (Coed academia, coed college system, the internet, etc), might be altering marriage patterns by bringing a high incidence of people with certain genetic traits together (under relatively favorable conditions, involving financial security & positive social status).... and resulting in both a larger number of children born to such parents than was previously the case, as well as a larger number of children who inherit a double whammey of the genes in question due to inheriting them from BOTH parents, thus raising the incidence of Ausbergers AND autism.

Does anybody have relevant data, such as high resolution distribution maps for autism or ausbergers?

(For the record, lest anybody be offended by my use of the geek/nerd terminology, etc, I first heard of all this from my aerospace engineer brother...... in conjunction with himself & his son..... and involving a suggestion that I had a number of the traits myself).

Kenuchelover.


Subject Author Posted

Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Joanne June 17, 2005 10:50AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Sue June 17, 2005 02:52PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Katherine Reece June 17, 2005 03:03PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Joanne June 17, 2005 05:36PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

John Wall June 17, 2005 05:54PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Anthony June 17, 2005 06:27PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Rick June 17, 2005 06:34PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Joanne June 18, 2005 07:50AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Anthony June 18, 2005 05:25PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Joanne June 19, 2005 10:16AM

Has anybody knowledge of regional distributions (Ausbergers syndrome issue?)

kenuchelover June 18, 2005 01:04AM

Re: Has anybody knowledge of regional distributions (Ausbergers syndrome issue?)

Joanne June 18, 2005 07:59AM

Re: Has anybody knowledge of regional distributions (Ausbergers syndrome issue?)

Joanne June 18, 2005 03:00PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Rick June 18, 2005 08:57AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

RickB June 18, 2005 09:05AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Joanne June 18, 2005 02:54PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Rick June 18, 2005 07:23PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence

Joanne June 19, 2005 10:18AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

Joanne June 20, 2005 10:54AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

Doug Weller June 20, 2005 01:44PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

Joanne June 20, 2005 03:03PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

Pete Clarke June 21, 2005 03:08AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

Joanne June 21, 2005 07:51AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

Pete Clarke June 21, 2005 09:55AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

Joanne June 21, 2005 11:09AM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update, Pubmed

Bart June 21, 2005 03:00PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

bernard June 25, 2005 01:18PM

Re: Refusal to Weigh Evidence - Update

bernard June 20, 2005 04:45PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login