Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 17, 2024, 7:35 pm UTC    
November 26, 2005 09:51PM
Recently here their was discussion of TDVC and the responsibility of the Author for people taking it seriously.

It is of interest to note that you can be sued for libeling someone in fiction. Needless to say the hurdles in such a suit are serious. In the following website [www.firstamendmentcenter.org]

The article quotes the following opinion.

Quote

Where the defendant invents defamatory dialogue or other defamatory details in what purports to be nonfiction, uses actual people as fictional characters, or bases fictional characters on living persons but fails sufficiently to disguise the characters, so that the fictional characters are understood to be 'of and concerning' their living models, liability for libel may result."

The article quotes a court case stating:

Quote

For a fictional character to constitute actionable defamation, the description of the fictional character must be so closely akin to the real person claiming to be defamed that a reader of the book, knowing the real person, would have no difficulty linking the two. Superficial similarities are insufficient.

In the same case the Court said:

Quote

The fact that the author used the plaintiff's actual name makes it reasonable that third persons would interpret the story as referring to the plaintiff despite the fictional label.

The article then discusses such things as Satire and proving the defamation. For example:

Quote

However, plaintiffs must clear certain hurdles. In order to state an actionable claim for defamation, a plaintiff must show: publication, defamatory meaning, false statement, identification and damages. In libel suits arising out of fiction, arguably the toughest hurdle for plaintiffs to clear is the identification, or "it's me" requirement. The plaintiff must establish that it is the plaintiff being defamed. In libel-law lingo, this is called the "of and concerning" requirement. Harvard law professor Frederick Schauer has called the "of and concerning" requirement "the centerpiece of litigation involving fiction.

All and all it is of interest that someone can be sued for libeling someone in fiction. I’m not surprised that the hurdles are difficult and probably of such a nature / expense as to limit lawsuits.

Of course none of this as any bearing on Ethical responsibility.


Pierre




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/26/2005 09:53PM by Pacal.
Subject Author Posted

Defamation in Fiction

Pacal November 26, 2005 09:51PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Jason Colavito November 27, 2005 08:18AM

any info. regarding defamation of groups?

JimLewandowski November 27, 2005 09:55AM

Re: any info. regarding defamation of groups?

Warwick L Nixon November 27, 2005 12:23PM

Re: any info. regarding defamation of groups?

JimLewandowski November 27, 2005 12:29PM

Re: any info. regarding defamation of groups?

Warwick L Nixon November 27, 2005 03:11PM

Re: any info. regarding defamation of groups?

JimLewandowski November 27, 2005 03:42PM

Re: any info. regarding defamation of groups?

Warwick L Nixon November 28, 2005 10:39AM

Re: any info. regarding defamation of groups?

Joanne November 27, 2005 02:51PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Richard Fusniak November 27, 2005 01:09PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

John Wall November 27, 2005 01:10PM

[post deleted]

Stephen Tonkin November 27, 2005 01:56PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Roxana Cooper November 27, 2005 01:48PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

JimLewandowski November 27, 2005 02:07PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Warwick L Nixon November 27, 2005 03:15PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Joanne November 27, 2005 03:58PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Warwick L Nixon November 28, 2005 10:44AM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Roxana Cooper November 27, 2005 04:44PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

JimLewandowski November 27, 2005 05:19PM

Request

lobo-hotei November 27, 2005 07:06PM

Re: Request

Warwick L Nixon November 28, 2005 10:45AM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Pacal November 27, 2005 07:21PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

JimLewandowski November 27, 2005 08:57PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Pacal November 28, 2005 11:09AM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

JimLewandowski November 28, 2005 11:43AM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Warwick L Nixon November 28, 2005 11:51AM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

JimLewandowski November 28, 2005 12:02PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Warwick L Nixon November 28, 2005 12:09PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

JimLewandowski November 28, 2005 12:13PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Warwick L Nixon November 28, 2005 12:16PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Roxana Cooper November 28, 2005 11:05AM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

JimLewandowski November 28, 2005 11:25AM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Warwick L Nixon November 28, 2005 11:37AM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

JimLewandowski November 28, 2005 11:40AM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Warwick L Nixon November 28, 2005 11:47AM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Lee November 28, 2005 12:57PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Warwick L Nixon November 28, 2005 01:04PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

JimLewandowski November 28, 2005 01:08PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Roxana November 28, 2005 12:56PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Roxana November 28, 2005 12:59PM

Re: Defamation in Fiction

Warwick L Nixon November 28, 2005 01:05PM

Roxana, re: your Q on sources for Vatican secret archives

JimLewandowski November 28, 2005 01:15PM

Moderators PLEASE!!!

Warwick L Nixon November 28, 2005 01:22PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.