cladking Wrote:
>
> Every single Egyptologist, anthropologist,
> archaeologist, etc, etc, etc believes to his core
> that ancient man in general and ancient Egyptians
> in particular were highly superstitious and used
> primitive tools, logic, thought, and technology.
>
Which is different from saying they "we know everything relevant about how the pyramids came to be and the nature of their builders".
Yep and they believe that because that is what the evidence shows. The fact that you don't believe it is your problem not theirs.
They believe that ancients lacked the ability to
> invent telephones and computers.
Did they?
They believe
> their writing was nonsensical.
Nope telling lies again. Okay you've been corrected on this many times. I guess you just like lying.Religious writing isn't 'nonsensical', it made perfect sense to them.
They believe that
> ancient people lacked modern science and the
> ability to experiment. They believe that people
> used to exist and deal with their world
> superstitiously.
Sure experimented they just didn't have the full aspect of the scientific methodology - yep and everything points to their being religious. You remember the 200 or so conversations we had about burial goods? REMEMBER?
>
> If any such scientists had any beliefs that don't
> agree with this they'd be laughed out of the
> profession and their funding would evaporate over
> time.
They'd be laugh at if they said the world was flat - if you go against the evidence you will be thought odd. Like you do
>
> The average person thinks the ancients were sun
> addled stumbled footed bumpkins and the Egyptians
> were stinky footed.
Nope you are lying again
The average person believes
> we sit at the crown of creation and have evolved
> in every way since the ancient Egyptians shuffled
> off.
Nope lying again
They believe we are more intelligent, more
> civilized, and more knowledgeable.
More knowledgeable but for the other two bits nope you are lying again
> Most people and nearly every scientist believe
> that the pyramids were built with muscle power
> applied with mechanical advantage (usually ramps).
> The vast majority of scientists believe the
> pyramids were tombs and that the Egyptian
> civilization lasted for more than 3000 years.
Yep that is what the evidence shows it not what they 'believe'.
>
> I challenge ALL of these BELIEFS.
That's nice it would be even nicer if you were right.
What we
> believe has been handed down by the confusion of
> language and 19th century "scientists" who made a
> series of erroneous assumptions.
In your opinion but as we've noted you live in fantasy world so why would we believe you? I mean you lie continuously and your 'research' techniques is based on repetition of lies.
> Your strawman arguments are hilarious especially
> when I'm accused of building strawmen.
Oh so says the king of hay
>
> Try to directly address even a single sentence
> above. I even left a couple you can take out of
> context and beat a strawman. If the argument is
> direct then I'll respond to it.
Why not just read the replies form the last 100 times we had this same discussion?
So how many times do you want to go over the same things?
You ignored my earlier points - so to summarize
You LIED about making a prediction.
You make up strawmen about what Science is and what scientists say about the actual evidence.
This is exceedingly boring.
