Nemtinakht Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hans Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Nemtinakht Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Hans Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Nemtinakht Wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You claim with "authority"
> that
> > the
> > > pyramids
> > > > were
> > > > > not built using ramps. How
> exactly
> > can
> > > you
> > > > type
> > > > > this with a straight face?
> You
> > claim
> > > there is
> > > > no
> > > > > evidence for ramps. But there
> is
> > far
> > > more
> > > > evidence
> > > > > for ramps than there is for
> geysers
> > and
> > > > > funiculars. The remains of
> ramps
> > have
> > > been
> > > > > excavated. They may not be
> fully
> > intact
> > > or
> > > > point
> > > > > to exactly where Cladking
> would
> > expect
> > > them
> > > > to,
> > > > > but this is a flaw in your
> own
> > logic,
> > > not in
> > > > > Egyptologys. On the other
> hand,
> > there
> > > have
> > > > been a
> > > > > grand total of ZERO geysers or
> the
> > > remains
> > > > of
> > > > > linear funiculars excavated
> > anywhere
> > > near
> > > > Giza.
> > > > > This is a FACT no matter how
> you
> > attempt
> > > to
> > > > spin
> > > > > it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Keep in mind that Giza was an
> > active
> > > > necropolis
> > > > > during the Fourth Dynasty.
> Any
> > external
> > > > ramps
> > > > > would have been disassembled.
> Some
> > of
> > > the
> > > > > materials were likely used to
> build
> > the
> > > very
> > > > > probable internal ramp. While
> the
> > rest
> > > were
> > > > > removed far from the pyramids
> > > themselves. To
> > > > > expect that any external
> ramps
> > would be
> > > > fully
> > > > > intact and resting against the
> side
> > of
> > > the
> > > > > pyramids after 4500 years
> defies
> > all
> > > logic
> > > > and
> > > > > reason.
> > > > >
> > > > > The word ramp is attested from
> the
> > Old
> > > > Kingdom. If
> > > > > you refuse to believe this
> than
> > your
> > > problem
> > > > is
> > > > > with James Allen, the world's
> > foremost
> > > > authority
> > > > > on the Egyptian language. I
> highly
> > doubt
> > > that
> > > > you
> > > > > Cladking understand the
> language
> > more
> > > than
> > > > he
> > > > > does.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To cover himself he now trying to
> claim
> > they
> > > both
> > > > existed and didn't exist. This is
> due to
> > his
> > > > superior knowledge of
> > metaphysics.....lol
> > > >
> > >
> > > Indeed. Little does he realize that he
> is
> > only
> > > digging himself deeper into a pit.
> > >
> > Its amusing that he seems to have forgotten -
> I
> > told him several times - that I studied his
> > character Cladking for just over a year and
> have
> > 300 pages of notes for a section of a book
> I'll
> > write in the near future.That include links
> to his
> > most amusing mis-statements and outright
> > whoppers.
> >
> >
>
> Now THAT is a book I am looking forward to
> reading. And I'm not usually one for fiction.
> Though I do enjoy historical fiction (which you
> write) when I have the time.
Yes I believe I mentioned the bare bones of it before.
A rascal of a character who in the 1840's come up with a radically different translation of AE writing (this was just when it was becoming known) - based on actual academic research and plausibility.
That will launch a British-Belgian-Prussian-Danish expedition (The Royal College of Rutland will be the sponsor). it will travel by the Nile in 1843 into the Hala'ib triangle of what is modern Egypt looking for the lost pyramid of the golden geyser of Horus.