Geotio Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Spiros Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> You continue to ignore the problems regarding
> lost distance "alignments " having to change
> bearing in order to arrive at their putative
> destinations ,and how the builders of the period
> would have known when and to what extent to change
> the orginal bearing .
It seems that Google Earth has no problem computing them, so we need to find who had this technology to pinpoint the builder or designers.


> Your whole point is subjective ,the "shapes " are
> highly irregular ,who is to say what should be
> chosen to be considered as the intended bearing
> when there is no evidence to to support that there
> was any bearing to consider in the first place .
A bearing exits whether it was taking into account or not. It's out job to gudge whether it was. A whouldn't agree that the shape is heighly irregular, I whould call it eerily regular. Its this regularity that makes it suspitious. I beleive the cuurvature was intentional. The Earth is not a cube it is spherical.

> You are cherry picking by selecting two points
> from approx 100 mounds,corners at least have some
> common ground .
Glad you agree that I am not cherry picking since I took the corners.

> I already told you "Even if we go along with that
> view and measure from the centre of the two
> extremes the bearing is still way off the great
> circle that will arrive at Stonehenge " .
>
> Measure the azimuth of these two points then
> compare with what is required for a great circle
> to arrive at Stonehenge , subtratct the difference
> and calculate the error.
> The whole idea is fantastical nonsense but going
> along with the fantasy the best option is to take
> an azimith from the corners , and the centre of
> the mounds at these corners , the whole thing is
> so lopsided any other solution is extreme cherry
> picking .
I don't have to do all that. Google Earth does it for me and the alignment is perfect. If you want to do the math yourself , then you have to have the coordinates not only of Stonehenge but also the coordinates of two stones you are measuring. Like I said you need on side satellite measurements.


> It is not only miles off it requires to change
> bearing to get to that point that is still
> wrong .
See above, perfect alignment, no miles no fathoms, nothing.