It is the edges of the shape than can be considered to relate to a bearing because it is only these shapes that are not subjective. Otherwise one can take any two middle circle he chooses, the ones that align better with his target choice. No way to cherry pick the corners because they are unique.

How do you figure that the bearing of the two extremes are way off the great circle that will arrive at Stonehenge when according to Google Earth they align perfectly. Are you using different software and or data?

I was not referring to different sites of general interest. I mean when somebody reads about this structure he does not say, gee let me check Google Earth to see if it aligns with the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, the first thing he thinks of is, if it aligns with Stonehenge. Well statistically there is a 999 out of 1000 probability that it does not. But it turns out that it does.

Of course he might not have thought of Stonehenge at all. He might have thought of a nice landmark like a tall mountain. Well in this case he would have once again found a correlation with Elbrus that I pointed out, and not on a far away continent like Australia or Antarctica.

Now the issue of who built it and how he knew this information or technology is a question people have been asking many times in regards to megalithic structures, pyramids etc. If their theories don't fit the evidence, then they should be discarded asap.




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/06/2015 10:37AM by Spiros.